Pentium M 765 vs Pro A10-8700B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2111not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoPentium M
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)October 2004 (19 years ago)
Current price$326 no data

Detailed specifications

Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus supportno data400 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data84 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.988-1.356V

Compatibility

Information on Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI1no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVXno data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
HSA+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pro A10-8700B 2200
+20%
Pentium M 765 1834

Pro A10-8700B outperforms Pentium M 765 by 20% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pro A10-8700B 2798
+224%
Pentium M 765 864

Pro A10-8700B outperforms Pentium M 765 by 224% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A10-8700B and Pentium M 765, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A10-8700B
Pro A10-8700B
Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 49 votes

Rate Pro A10-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A10-8700B or Pentium M 765, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.