Celeron M 353 vs Phenom X4 9850 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X4 9850 BE and Celeron M 353 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | March 2008 (16 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9850 BE and Celeron M 353 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9850 BE and Celeron M 353 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 5 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9850 BE and Celeron M 353 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 5 Watt |
Phenom X4 9850 BE has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 353, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9850 BE and Celeron M 353. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom X4 9850 BE is a desktop processor while Celeron M 353 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9850 BE and Celeron M 353, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
