Ryzen 3 3300U vs Pentium M 765

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1508
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiencyno data22.55
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache32 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm12 nm
Die size87 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 million4940 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.988-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FP5
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 765 1834
Ryzen 3 3300U 4280
+133%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 765 864
Ryzen 3 3300U 4332
+401%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 October 2004 6 January 2019
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium M 765 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3300U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 3 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
Ryzen 3 3300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 216 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or Ryzen 3 3300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.