Athlon X2 QL-60 vs Pentium M 765

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 765
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.22
Athlon X2 QL-60
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.34
+54.5%

Athlon X2 QL-60 outperforms Pentium M 765 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and Athlon X2 QL-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31953071
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium M2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency0.990.92
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and Athlon X2 QL-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache32 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and Athlon X2 QL-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479S1
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Athlon X2 QL-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and Athlon X2 QL-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Athlon X2 QL-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Athlon X2 QL-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 765 0.22
Athlon X2 QL-60 0.34
+54.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 765 1834
+44.1%
Athlon X2 QL-60 1273

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 765 864
Athlon X2 QL-60 1352
+56.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 0.34
Recency 20 October 2004 3 June 2008
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 35 Watt

Pentium M 765 has 400% lower power consumption.

Athlon X2 QL-60, on the other hand, has a 54.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon X2 QL-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 765 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Athlon X2 QL-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
Athlon X2 QL-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 34 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or Athlon X2 QL-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.