Pentium M 715 vs Pentium M 765
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 765 and Pentium M 715 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Pentium M | Pentium M |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
Release date | October 2004 (19 years ago) | June 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 765 and Pentium M 715 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 84 mm2 | 84 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 140 million | 140 million |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 765 and Pentium M 715 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 479 | 479 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 21 Watt |
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.