Xeon Silver 4114 vs EPYC 7351P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
16.59
+95.4%

EPYC 7351P outperforms Xeon Silver 4114 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking382878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.2918.91
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon Silver
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750$694

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4114 has 201% better value for money than EPYC 7351P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3220
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplier2422
L1 cache1.5 MB640 KB
L2 cache8 MB10 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)13.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4Socket P
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB768 GB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351P 16.59
+95.4%
Xeon Silver 4114 8.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 25657
+95.3%
Xeon Silver 4114 13139

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7351P 630
Xeon Silver 4114 852
+35.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7351P 4738
Xeon Silver 4114 5225
+10.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.59 8.49
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 20
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 85 Watt

EPYC 7351P has a 95.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4114, on the other hand, has 82.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4114 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and Xeon Silver 4114, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
Intel Xeon Silver 4114
Xeon Silver 4114

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4114 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351P or Xeon Silver 4114, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.