Pentium M 715 vs Celeron M 380

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 380
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.17
+6.3%
Pentium M 715
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.16

Celeron M 380 outperforms Pentium M 715 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32843303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MPentium M
Power efficiency0.770.72
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateno data23 June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz400 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data87 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data144 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292V0.988V-1.34V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 380 0.17
+6.3%
Pentium M 715 0.16

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M 380 111
+3.6%
Pentium M 715 115

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.16
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron M 380 has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Pentium M 715, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Pentium M 715, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
Intel Pentium M 715
Pentium M 715

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 4 votes

Rate Pentium M 715 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or Pentium M 715, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.