Celeron M 350 vs Pentium M 765

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MCeleron M
Power efficiency0.99no data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache32 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988-1.356V1.26V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479PPGA478, H-PBGA479, H-PBGA478, PPGA479
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 21 Watt

Pentium M 765 has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
Intel Celeron M 350
Celeron M 350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Celeron M 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or Celeron M 350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.