Athlon II Neo K125 vs Mobile Pentium 4 552

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Athlon II Neo K125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Pentium 4AMD Athlon II Neo
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Geneva (2010)
Release dateno data12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Athlon II Neo K125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus support533 MHz2000 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Athlon II Neo K125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataS1
Power consumption (TDP)88 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Athlon II Neo K125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3 memory controller
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Athlon II Neo K125 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Athlon II Neo K125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Mobile Pentium 4 552 86
+5.5%
Athlon II Neo K125 90.7

Athlon II Neo K125 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 552 by 5% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 88 Watt 12 Watt

We couldn't decide between Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Athlon II Neo K125. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Pentium 4 552 and Athlon II Neo K125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Mobile Pentium 4 552
Mobile Pentium 4 552
AMD Athlon II Neo K125
Athlon II Neo K125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 552 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Pentium 4 552 or Athlon II Neo K125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.