Apple M2 Max vs FX-4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.95
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
17.41
+793%

Apple M2 Max outperforms FX-4300 by a whopping 793% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1966384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency1.8720.10
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 cache4096 KB36 MB
L3 cacheno data48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Apple M2 Max.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4300 1.95
Apple M2 Max 17.41
+793%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4300 2985
Apple M2 Max 26638
+792%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 17.41
Recency 23 October 2012 17 January 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 79 Watt

Apple M2 Max has a 792.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 540% more advanced lithography process, and 20.3% lower power consumption.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4300 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4300 is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1712 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 232 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.