FX-4300 vs Apple M2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.40
+400%
FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.88

Apple M2 outperforms FX-4300 by a whopping 400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 and FX-4300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8151988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.35
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency44.251.86
Architecture codenameno dataVishera (2012−2015)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 and FX-4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache2 MBno data
L2 cache20 MB4096 KB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors20000 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 and FX-4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 and FX-4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 and FX-4300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 and FX-4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 and FX-4300.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 9.40
+400%
FX-4300 1.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
+401%
FX-4300 2981

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.40 1.88
Recency 10 June 2022 23 October 2012
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 95 Watt

Apple M2 has a 400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 540% more advanced lithography process, and 375% lower power consumption.

The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while FX-4300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and FX-4300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
AMD FX-4300
FX-4300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 618 votes

Rate Apple M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1740 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 or FX-4300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.