Apple M2 Max vs FX-8320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.53
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
14.71
+317%

Apple M2 Max outperforms FX-8320 by a whopping 317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1459456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.44no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$106 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 cache8192 KB36 MB
L3 cacheno data48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Apple M2 Max.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320 3.53
Apple M2 Max 14.71
+317%

Apple M2 Max outperforms FX-8320 by 317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8320 5457
Apple M2 Max 26453
+385%

Apple M2 Max outperforms FX-8320 by 385% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.53 14.71
Recency 23 October 2012 17 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 79 Watt

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1300 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 220 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.