FX-4300 vs Apple M1 Pro

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
10.83
+476%
FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.88

Apple M1 Pro outperforms FX-4300 by a whopping 476% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M1 Pro and FX-4300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7211988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.35
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data1.87
Architecture codenameno dataVishera (2012−2015)
Release date18 October 2021 (3 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M1 Pro and FX-4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads104
Base clock speed2.064 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MBno data
L2 cache28 MB4096 KB
L3 cache24 MBno data
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors33700 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on M1 Pro and FX-4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Pro and FX-4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 Pro and FX-4300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Pro and FX-4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 Pro and FX-4300.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 Pro 10.83
+476%
FX-4300 1.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M1 Pro 17201
+477%
FX-4300 2981

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.83 1.88
Recency 18 October 2021 23 October 2012
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 10 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm

Apple M1 Pro has a 476.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while FX-4300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and FX-4300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro
AMD FX-4300
FX-4300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 411 votes

Rate M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1742 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M1 Pro or FX-4300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.