Phenom II X4 N950 vs i3-7102E

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.64
+5.1%
Phenom II X4 N950
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.56

Core i3-7102E outperforms Phenom II X4 N950 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20872120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i34x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency6.204.22
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s3600 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataS1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7102E 1.64
+5.1%
Phenom II X4 N950 1.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7102E 2599
+4.6%
Phenom II X4 N950 2485

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.64 1.56
Recency 3 January 2017 4 October 2010
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

i3-7102E has a 5.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X4 N950, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7102E and Phenom II X4 N950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
AMD Phenom II X4 N950
Phenom II X4 N950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 28 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7102E or Phenom II X4 N950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.