Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Ultra 9 285H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 257 | 284 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 44.76 | 35.12 |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-H | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | no data | 25 July 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 4 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.12 | 19.89 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 54 Watt |
Ultra 9 285H has a 6.2% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores, and 20% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, on the other hand, has 50% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
