Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Ultra 9 285H
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 256 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 44.79 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-H | Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 4 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX+, SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ultra 9 285H has 33.3% more physical cores.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, on the other hand, has 50% more threads, and 60.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
