Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Ultra 9 285H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Ryzen AI 9 365 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 257 | 347 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 44.52 | 60.22 |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-H | Strix Point (2024) |
| Release date | no data | July 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 4 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 880M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 365.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.28 | 17.91 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 10 |
| Threads | 16 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ultra 9 285H has a 18.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more physical cores.
Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has 25% more threads, and 60.7% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 365 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
