A4-9120C vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Aggregate performance score
A4-9120C outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3296 | 2857 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 2.75 | 8.52 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 1200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 0.54 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 6 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 20% lower power consumption.
A4-9120C, on the other hand, has a 237.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.
The A4-9120C is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
