A4-9120 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2636
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloBristol Ridge
Power efficiencyno data4.86
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956BGA
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 1 June 2017
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 10 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 100% lower power consumption.

A4-9120, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and A4-9120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD A4-9120
A4-9120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 495 votes

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3300 or A4-9120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.