FX-4170 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX6700
4 cores / 4 threads
1.37
FX-4170
2012
4 cores / 4 threads
1.96
+43.1%

FX-4170 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 43% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and FX-4170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21111828
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation2.940.43
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release dateno data27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$312 $86

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 has 584% better value for money than FX-4170.

Detailed Specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and FX-4170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data4096 KB
L3 cacheno data8192 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and FX-4170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and FX-4170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and FX-4170 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and FX-4170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and FX-4170.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 1.37
FX-4170 1.96
+43.1%

FX-4170 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 43% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2118
FX-4170 3034
+43.2%

FX-4170 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 43% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.37 1.96
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 125 Watt

The FX-4170 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and FX-4170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
AMD FX-4170
FX-4170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 44 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 70 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6700 or FX-4170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.