Core 2 Extreme QX6700 vs FX-6100

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.32
+74.4%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
1.33

FX-6100 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18102262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)
Power efficiency2.310.97
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Kentsfield (2007)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.67 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache288 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB8 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 2.32
+74.4%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 1.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6100 3691
+74.3%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 1.33
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

FX-6100 has a 74.4% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The FX-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Core 2 Extreme QX6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1114 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or Core 2 Extreme QX6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.