Atom E640 vs Celeron N6211
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Atom E640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2197 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 20.53 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Tunnel Creek (2010) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | 14 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Atom E640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 26 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Atom E640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1493 | Intel BGA 676 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom E640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom E640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | Intel GMA 600 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 14 September 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 3 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
Atom E640, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Atom E640. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Atom E640 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Atom E640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
