Celeron N2930 vs N3160

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron N3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.77
+16.7%
Celeron N2930
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
0.66

N3160 outperforms N2930 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25102605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years old)23 February 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$288 (2.7x MSRP)$820

Technical specs

Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz2.16 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched
HD Audio+no data
RST--

Security technologies

Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Braswell)Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency640 MHz854 MHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision2.0/3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports55
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3160 0.77
+16.7%
Celeron N2930 0.66

N3160 outperforms N2930 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3160 1180
+16.3%
Celeron N2930 1015

N3160 outperforms N2930 by 16% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3160 171
+11%
Celeron N2930 154

N3160 outperforms N2930 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3160 508
+11.2%
Celeron N2930 457

N3160 outperforms N2930 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.77 0.66
Recency 15 January 2016 23 February 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 7 Watt

The Celeron N3160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2930 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3160 and Celeron N2930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N2930
Celeron N2930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 189 votes

Rate Intel Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 54 votes

Rate Intel Celeron N2930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3160 or Celeron N2930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.