Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 vs Celeron M P4600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron M P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads
0.58
+1.8%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
2008
2 cores / 2 threads
0.57

Celeron M P4600 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26692673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron M2x AMD Turion Ultra
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date1 October 2010 (13 years old)4 June 2008 (15 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current priceno data$28

Technical specs

Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus support2500 MHz4400 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA988S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization, Dual Channel DDR2 memory controller
PowerNowno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M P4600 0.58
+1.8%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 0.57

Celeron M P4600 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron M P4600 34.29
+6.4%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 36.5

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 outperforms Celeron M P4600 by 6% in wPrime 32.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.58 0.57
Recency 1 October 2010 4 June 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.