EPYC 9474F vs Celeron M P4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
67.89
+11605%

EPYC 9474F outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a whopping 11605% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27129
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.74
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Genoa
Release date1 October 2010 (13 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$6,780
Current priceno data$3950 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size81+114 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors382+177 Million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPGA988SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 67.89
Recency 1 October 2010 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Cost $86 $6780
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M P4600 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9474F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9474F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or EPYC 9474F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.