Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Celeron M P4600

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2657not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 October 2010 (13 years old)1 September 2009 (14 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current priceno data$280

Technical specs

Celeron M P4600 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus support2500 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache2 MB3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+114 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA988BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core 2 Duo SU7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1
AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron M P4600 1886
+26.1%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 1496

Celeron M P4600 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 26% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M P4600 4213
+49.8%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 2813

Celeron M P4600 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 50% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M P4600 1804
+53.1%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 1178

Celeron M P4600 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 53% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron M P4600 34.29
+78.8%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 61.3

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Celeron M P4600 by 79% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron M P4600 1
+64.9%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 1

Celeron M P4600 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by 65% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 October 2010 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4600 and Core 2 Duo SU7300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Core 2 Duo SU7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Core 2 Duo SU7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Intel Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 37 votes

Rate Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or Core 2 Duo SU7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.