Processor N200 vs Celeron M 575
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2002 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Alder Lake-N |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (15 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
| Current price | $235 (2.7x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus support | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 575 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 575 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 575 and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Processor N200 outperforms Celeron M 575 by 105% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Processor N200 outperforms Celeron M 575 by 294% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Processor N200 outperforms Celeron M 575 by 335% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2008 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 6 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 575 and Processor N200. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
