Intel Celeron M 575 vs AMD A6-9225

Intel Celeron M 575
AMD A6-9225

General info

Comparing Celeron M 575 and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
Intel Celeron M
AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename
Stoney Ridge
Release date
1 June 2008
1 June 2018
Launch price (MSRP)
no data

Technical specs

Celeron M 575 and A6-9225 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Celeron M 575 and A6-9225 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Maximum frequency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Bus support
667 MHz
no data
L1 cache
no data
160 KB
L2 cache
1 MB
1 MB
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Die size
143 mm2
124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature
no data
90 °C
Transistor count
291 Million
1200 Million
64 bit support


Information on Celeron M 575 and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Power consumption (TDP)
31 Watt
10-15 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and A6-9225 are enumerated here.

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into Celeron M 575 and A6-9225.
Integrated graphics
no data
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Celeron M 575 and A6-9225. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

Celeron M 575 1.73 +1.2%
A6-9225 1.71

3DMark06 CPU

Celeron M 575 898
A6-9225 2132 +137.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Celeron M 575 1917
A6-9225 2532 +32.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Celeron M 575 1917
A6-9225 4193 +118.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Celeron M 575 and A6-9225 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of Intel Celeron M 575

1.2% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of AMD A6-9225

Much newer (1 June 2018 vs 1 June 2008)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 65 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 31 watts)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)

So, Celeron M 575 or A6-9225?

Technical City couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 575 and AMD A6-9225. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
Intel Celeron M 575
AMD A6-9225

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as give your rating.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 575 or A6-9225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.