AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Celeron M 575

AMD A9-9425
Intel Celeron M 575

General info

Comparing A9-9425 and Celeron M 575 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
 
Type
Laptop
 
Laptop
Series
AMD Bristol Ridge
 
Intel Celeron M
Achitecture codename
Stoney Ridge
 
Merom
Release date
1 June 2016
 
1 June 2008
Launch price (MSRP)
n/d
 
$86

Technical specs

A9-9425 and Celeron M 575 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A9-9425 and Celeron M 575 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
2
 
1
Number of threads
2
 
1
Maximum frequency
3.7 GHz
 
2 GHz
Bus support
n/d
 
667 MHz
L2 cache
1 MB
 
1 MB
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
65 nm
Die size
124.5 mm2
 
143 mm2
Maximum core temperature
90 °C
 
n/d
Transistor count
1200 Million
 
291 Million
64 bit support
+
 
+

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Celeron M 575 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Socket
BGA
 
PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)
10-25 Watt
 
31 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Celeron M 575 are enumerated here.
AMD-V
+
 
-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into A9-9425 and Celeron M 575.
Integrated graphics
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)
 
n/d

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A9-9425 and Celeron M 575. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

A9-9425 5.20
Celeron M 575 9.37 +80.2%

3DMark06 CPU

A9-9425 2314 +157.7%
Celeron M 575 898

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

A9-9425 2686 +40.1%
Celeron M 575 1917

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

A9-9425 4338 +126.3%
Celeron M 575 1917

Gaming performance

Let's see how good A9-9425 and Celeron M 575 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD A9-9425

Much newer (1 June 2016 vs 1 June 2008)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 65 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 31 watts)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)

Advantages of Intel Celeron M 575

80.2% faster (about 2 times) in synthetic tests

So, A9-9425 or Celeron M 575?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel Celeron M 575.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Celeron M 575, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD A9-9425
Intel Celeron M 575
Like
Like

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Celeron M 575, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.