i9-10980XE vs Celeron M 390
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 263 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 11.31 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.84 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Cascade Lake-X (2019) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 19 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $979 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 8 GT/s DMI3 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 24.75 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 86 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | FCLGA2066 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 94 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 18 |
| Threads | 1 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 165 Watt |
Celeron M 390 has 685.7% lower power consumption.
i9-10980XE, on the other hand, has 1700% more physical cores and 3500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 390 is a notebook processor while Core i9-10980XE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 390 and Core i9-10980XE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
