Celeron N5095A vs J4025

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.96
Celeron N5095A
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.69
+180%

Celeron N5095A outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25091717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.57no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.7516.35
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel UHD Graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz750 MHz
Execution Units1216

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes68
USB revision2.0/3.02.0/3.2
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports814
Integrated LAN--
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.96
Celeron N5095A 2.69
+180%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1467
Celeron N5095A 4118
+181%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 2.69
Integrated graphics card 0.87 5.57
Recency 4 November 2019 1 July 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J4025 has 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has a 180.2% higher aggregate performance score, 540.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron N5095A is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 124 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 97 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.