E1 Micro-6200T vs Celeron J1750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1750
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.37
E1 Micro-6200T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.38
+2.7%

E1 Micro-6200T outperforms Celeron J1750 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30353030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD E-Series
Power efficiency3.509.10
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Mullins (2014)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.41 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1750 0.37
E1 Micro-6200T 0.38
+2.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1750 595
E1 Micro-6200T 600
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 0.38
Recency 1 September 2013 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 3 Watt

Celeron J1750 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

E1 Micro-6200T, on the other hand, has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1750 and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750
AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1750 or E1 Micro-6200T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.