Core i7-2610UE vs Celeron G3900TE

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads
1.20
+31.9%
Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads
0.91

Celeron G3900TE outperforms Core i7-2610UE by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22232401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation1.350.02
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$42$317
Current price$42 (1x MSRP)$4700 (14.8x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3900TE has 6650% better value for money than i7-2610UE.

Detailed Specifications

Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mmno data
Number of transistorsno data624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA-1151no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size64 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510Intel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900TE 1.20
+31.9%
i7-2610UE 0.91

Celeron G3900TE outperforms Core i7-2610UE by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3900TE 1850
+31.3%
i7-2610UE 1409

Celeron G3900TE outperforms Core i7-2610UE by 31% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.20 0.91
Integrated graphics card 1.37 0.66
Threads 2 4
Cost $42 $317
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

The Celeron G3900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2610UE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900TE and Core i7-2610UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE
Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900TE or Core i7-2610UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.