Mobile Sempron M100 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Mobile Sempron M100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2988 | 3188 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.08 | 0.83 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.40 | 0.22 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has a 81.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Mobile Sempron M100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
