Turion II Ultra M620 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Aggregate performance score
Turion II Ultra M620 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3316 | 3195 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Turion II Ultra |
| Power efficiency | 0.45 | 0.56 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion II Ultra M620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion II Ultra M620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Turion II Ultra M620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.37 | 0.46 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 10 September 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Turion II Ultra M620 has a 24.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Turion II Ultra M620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
