Athlon Silver 3050e vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1886 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Dali (Zen) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 June 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Athlon Silver 3050e outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by 105% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Athlon Silver 3050e outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by 129% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 1 June 2020 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon Silver 3050e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
