Ryzen 3 8300G vs Celeron 667
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Timna | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| Release date | no data | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $176 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.67 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 129 mm2 | 137 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 20,900 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 370S | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel i752 | AMD Radeon 740M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron 667 has 116.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 667 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
