VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 vs Atom 330

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomC7-M
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Esther
Release date22 September 2008 (15 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data
Current price$306 (7.1x MSRP)$350

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus support533 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size52 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA437no data
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom 330 116.45
+63.2%
VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 190

VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 outperforms Atom 330 by 63% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 12 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
VIA C7-M C7-M-1600
C7-M C7-M-1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 57 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 28 votes

Rate VIA C7-M C7-M-1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or VIA C7-M C7-M-1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.