AMD A9-9425 vs Phenom X4 9750B

AMD A9-9425
AMD Phenom X4 9750B

General info

Comparing A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
AMD Bristol Ridge
Achitecture codename
Stoney Ridge
Release date
1 June 2016
on August 2008

Technical specs

A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Maximum frequency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
L1 cache
128 KB (per core)
L2 cache
1 MB
512 KB (per core)
L3 cache
2 MB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
65 nm
Die size
124.5 mm2
285 mm2
Maximum core temperature
90 °C
Transistor count
1200 Million
450 million
64 bit support


Information on A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
10-25 Watt
95 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B are enumerated here.

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B.
Integrated graphics
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

A9-9425 5.20
Phenom X4 9750B 5.65 +8.7%


A9-9425 2496
Phenom X4 9750B 2709 +8.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD A9-9425

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 65 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 95 watts)

Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9750B

8.7% faster in synthetic tests
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - the very first (1996) SIMD instruction expansion for Intel desktop CPUs, works with 64-bit registers)
3DNow! (older SIMD instructions set used by AMD CPUs. Supercedes MMX, works with 64-bit registers)
SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - a SIMD instruction extension working with 128-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)

So, A9-9425 or Phenom X4 9750B?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A9-9425 and AMD Phenom X4 9750B. The differences in performance seem too small.
Be aware that A9-9425 is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9750B is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Phenom X4 9750B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD A9-9425
AMD Phenom X4 9750B

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Phenom X4 9750B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.