L40S vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs with L40S, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020
28 Watt
4.48

L40S outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by a whopping 733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking660121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.749.13
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeAD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)13 October 2022 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4818176
Core clock speed350 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,431
Floating-point processing powerno data91.61 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data48 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−724%
140−150
+724%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 11
−718%
90−95
+718%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−692%
95−100
+692%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−721%
230−240
+721%
Hitman 3 10
−700%
80−85
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 36
−706%
290−300
+706%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−678%
350−400
+678%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−721%
230−240
+721%
Hitman 3 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−700%
240−250
+700%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−724%
140−150
+724%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−678%
350−400
+678%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−721%
230−240
+721%
Hitman 3 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
−692%
95−100
+692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−713%
130−140
+713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−713%
65−70
+713%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−678%
350−400
+678%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Hitman 3 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−721%
230−240
+721%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Hitman 3 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and L40S compete in popular games:

  • L40S is 724% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.48 37.33
Recency 15 August 2020 13 October 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 300 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has 971.4% lower power consumption.

L40S, on the other hand, has a 733.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The L40S is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook card while L40S is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
NVIDIA L40S
L40S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 447 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 22 votes

Rate L40S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.