Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
2.12

AI PRO R9700 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 3242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking90117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.99
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2021 (4 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164096
Core clock speed350 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data747.5
Floating-point processing powerno data47.84 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−3082%
350−400
+3082%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
−3161%
750−800
+3161%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Counter-Strike 2 17
−3135%
550−600
+3135%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Far Cry 5 8
−3150%
260−270
+3150%
Fortnite 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−3082%
350−400
+3082%
Forza Horizon 5 9
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
Valorant 40−45
−3150%
1300−1350
+3150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Counter-Strike 2 5
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−3156%
1400−1450
+3156%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Dota 2 23
−3161%
750−800
+3161%
Far Cry 5 7
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Fortnite 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−3082%
350−400
+3082%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Valorant 40−45
−3150%
1300−1350
+3150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Dota 2 22
−3082%
700−750
+3082%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−3082%
350−400
+3082%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Valorant 40−45
−3150%
1300−1350
+3150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−3233%
500−550
+3233%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−3233%
700−750
+3233%
Valorant 16−18
−3135%
550−600
+3135%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−3025%
500−550
+3025%
Valorant 10−12
−3082%
350−400
+3082%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 3082% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.12 70.86
Recency 30 March 2021 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm

AI PRO R9700 has a 3242.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 389 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.