Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Vega 7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega 7 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Vega 7
2021
45 Watt
6.73

AI PRO R9700 outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 1001% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58915
Place by popularity13not in top-100
Power efficiency11.3917.99
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCezanneNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 April 2021 (4 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4484096
Core clock speed300 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20747.5
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs28256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.21.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−987%
250−260
+987%
1440p28
−971%
300−350
+971%
4K18
−956%
190−200
+956%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−956%
190−200
+956%
Hogwarts Legacy 17
−959%
180−190
+959%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 28
−971%
300−310
+971%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−971%
150−160
+971%
Far Cry 5 20
−1000%
220−230
+1000%
Fortnite 63
−932%
650−700
+932%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−981%
400−450
+981%
Forza Horizon 5 24
−983%
260−270
+983%
Hogwarts Legacy 12
−983%
130−140
+983%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−980%
270−280
+980%
Valorant 70−75
−981%
800−850
+981%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 23
−987%
250−260
+987%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
−934%
600−650
+934%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Far Cry 5 18
−956%
190−200
+956%
Fortnite 27
−974%
290−300
+974%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−900%
350−400
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 21
−995%
230−240
+995%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−959%
180−190
+959%
Hogwarts Legacy 10
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Metro Exodus 13
−977%
140−150
+977%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
−987%
250−260
+987%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−953%
200−210
+953%
Valorant 73
−996%
800−850
+996%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21
−995%
230−240
+995%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−956%
95−100
+956%
Far Cry 5 18
−956%
190−200
+956%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−974%
290−300
+974%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−980%
270−280
+980%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−977%
140−150
+977%
Valorant 25
−980%
270−280
+980%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14
−971%
150−160
+971%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−983%
130−140
+983%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−938%
550−600
+938%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%
Valorant 48
−942%
500−550
+942%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−956%
190−200
+956%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 25
−980%
270−280
+980%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−991%
120−130
+991%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%

This is how Vega 7 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 987% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 971% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 956% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.73 74.07
Recency 13 April 2021 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

Vega 7 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1000.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3021 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 7 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.