Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs CMP 170HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA100Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 September 2021 (3 years ago)July 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$4,299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44804096
Core clock speed1140 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8747.5
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs128128
TMUs280256
Tensor Cores280128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1458 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,493 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

CMP 170HX has 20% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between CMP 170HX and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 170HX or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.