Arc A380 vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	581	337
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	43.84
Power efficiency	29.42	14.88
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	1024
Core clock speed	350 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	131.2
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	32
TMUs	24	64
Tensor Cores	no data	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	222 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	6 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	186.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.12

Arc A380 15.48
+153%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465

Arc A380 6233
+153%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

18−20

−161%

47
+161%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −292%	47 +292%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −160%	50−55 +160%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −208%	37 +208%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −262%	94 +262%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −207%	40−45 +207%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −294%	63 +294%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −105%	35−40 +105%
Valorant	21−24 −210%	65−70 +210%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −160%	50−55 +160%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −158%	31 +158%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Dota 2	21−24 −50%	33 +50%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −121%	64 +121%
Fortnite	35−40 −134%	85−90 +134%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −208%	80 +208%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −207%	40−45 +207%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −50%	33 +50%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −175%	44 +175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −117%	110−120 +117%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −105%	35−40 +105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Valorant	21−24 −210%	65−70 +210%
World of Tanks	100−110 −102%	200−210 +102%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −160%	50−55 +160%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −125%	27 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Dota 2	21−24 −150%	55−60 +150%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −100%	55−60 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −135%	61 +135%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −207%	40−45 +207%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −117%	110−120 +117%
Valorant	21−24 −210%	65−70 +210%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −208%	110−120 +208%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
World of Tanks	45−50 −143%	110−120 +143%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −200%	30−35 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −350%	35−40 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Valorant	16−18 −141%	40−45 +141%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 −64.7%	27−30 +64.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −64.7%	27−30 +64.7%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −167%	45−50 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −64.7%	27−30 +64.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	16−18 −135%	40−45 +135%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Fortnite	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −229%	21−24 +229%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Valorant	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

Arc A380 is 161% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A380 is 350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc A380 is ahead in 53 tests (96%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.12	15.48
Recency	24 May 2018	14 June 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 152.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.