Arc A380 vs HD Graphics 620

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD Graphics 620
2016
32768 Mb DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
2.42

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics 620 by a whopping 498% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking803332
Place by popularity41not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4621.00
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake GT2DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 August 2016 (7 years ago)14 June 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current price$353 $591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A380 has 4465% better value for money than HD Graphics 620.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores241024
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors189 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate25.20131.2
Floating-point performance403.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 620 and Arc A380 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared15.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data186.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 620 2.42
Arc A380 14.47
+498%

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 498% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 620 935
Arc A380 6211
+564%

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 564% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 620 5803
Arc A380 10174
+75.3%

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 75% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 620 1509
Arc A380 60804
+3931%

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 3931% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 620 934
Arc A380 9728
+942%

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 942% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 620 7725
Arc A380 466666
+5941%

Arc A380 outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 5941% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−243%
48
+243%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 6
−933%
62
+933%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3050%
63
+3050%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−591%
76
+591%
Hitman 3 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
−1020%
56
+1020%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 55

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1567%
50
+1567%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1340%
72
+1340%
Hitman 3 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1333%
43
+1333%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1233%
40
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−411%
46
+411%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−1220%
66
+1220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 48

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−867%
29
+867%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1633%
52
+1633%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2600%
54
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1040%
57
+1040%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−467%
34
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 25

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Hitman 3 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hitman 3 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

This is how HD Graphics 620 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 243% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A380 is 3050% faster than the HD Graphics 620.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A380 surpassed HD Graphics 620 in all 44 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.42 14.47
Recency 30 August 2016 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2340 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 717 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.