RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Aggregated performance score
RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) by 4459% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 981 | 27 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.61 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 (2021) | Ada Lovelace |
| GPU code name | Gen. 11 | AD102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 9 August 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | no data | $5296 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | 12800 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 2550 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 76,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.8 - 10 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1,020 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 18 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 576.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.3 |
| CUDA | no data | 8.9 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 8
−4275%
| 350−400
+4275%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−4344%
|
400−450
+4344%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−4186%
|
300−310
+4186%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−4344%
|
400−450
+4344%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−4186%
|
300−310
+4186%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−4233%
|
130−140
+4233%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−4275%
|
350−400
+4275%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−4300%
|
220−230
+4300%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−4186%
|
300−310
+4186%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−4233%
|
130−140
+4233%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−4300%
|
220−230
+4300%
|
This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:
- RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 4275% faster than UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 60.63 |
| Recency | 11 January 2021 | 9 August 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 250 Watt |
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
