GeForce MX570 vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile UHD Graphics G7 UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
VS
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
2.71

MX570 outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 380% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.6041.27
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed300 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1155 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.92
Floating-point processing powerno data4.731 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−200%
39
+200%
4K9
−344%
40−45
+344%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 8
−350%
35−40
+350%
Counter-Strike 2 17
−618%
122
+618%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−414%
35−40
+414%
Battlefield 5 8
−663%
60−65
+663%
Counter-Strike 2 16
−563%
106
+563%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Fortnite 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−321%
55−60
+321%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−271%
50−55
+271%
Valorant 45−50
−157%
110−120
+157%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−414%
35−40
+414%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
Counter-Strike 2 4
−900%
40
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
−540%
190−200
+540%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Dota 2 22
−309%
90−95
+309%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Fortnite 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−321%
55−60
+321%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
−671%
54
+671%
Metro Exodus 2
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−271%
50−55
+271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−290%
35−40
+290%
Valorant 45−50
−157%
110−120
+157%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Dota 2 20
−350%
90−95
+350%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−321%
55−60
+321%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−271%
50−55
+271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−580%
34
+580%
Valorant 45−50
−157%
110−120
+157%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−377%
100−110
+377%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−432%
130−140
+432%
Valorant 27−30
−425%
140−150
+425%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Valorant 14−16
−413%
75−80
+413%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 9
−467%
50−55
+467%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 200% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX570 is 344% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 57 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.71 13.00
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 25 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has 108.3% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 379.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
GTX 460M GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
GT 650M GeForce GT 650M
RX 640 OEM Radeon RX 640 OEM
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
RTX 2060 12 GB GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
T600 Max-Q T600 Max Q
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
Apple M1 GPU M1 GPU
vs
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685
vs
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
vs
RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
RTX 4060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
RTX 5000 X2 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 376 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 96 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.