GeForce MX570 vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Place in the ranking	761	362
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.70	40.94
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	2048
Core clock speed	300 MHz	832 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1155 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-25 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	73.92
Floating-point processing power	no data	4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	40
TMUs	no data	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	96 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13 −192%	38 +192%
4K	9 −344%	40−45 +344%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −500%	45−50 +500%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Forza Horizon 4	12 −400%	60−65 +400%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −1200%	35−40 +1200%
Metro Exodus	8 −413%	40−45 +413%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6 −500%	35−40 +500%
Valorant	5−6 −1100%	60−65 +1100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −500%	45−50 +500%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Dota 2	12 +0%	12 +0%
Far Cry 5	13 −423%	68 +423%
Fortnite	18−20 −361%	80−85 +361%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −445%	60−65 +445%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −1200%	35−40 +1200%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 −657%	50−55 +657%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	32 −234%	100−110 +234%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −227%	35−40 +227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Valorant	5−6 −1100%	60−65 +1100%
World of Tanks	30 −543%	190−200 +543%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −500%	45−50 +500%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Dota 2	20 −165%	50−55 +165%
Far Cry 5	12 −350%	50−55 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	13 −362%	60−65 +362%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −1200%	35−40 +1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −269%	100−110 +269%
Valorant	5−6 −1100%	60−65 +1100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −532%	130−140 +532%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
World of Tanks	21−24 −373%	100−110 +373%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −350%	35−40 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1750%	35−40 +1750%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Valorant	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −389%	40−45 +389%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Dota 2	9 −189%	24−27 +189%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Fortnite	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Valorant	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is 192% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX570 is 344% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 2000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is ahead in 58 tests (91%)
there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.03	14.26
Chip lithography	10 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	25 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has 108.3% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 370.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

GeForce MX570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

GeForce GTX 460M

GeForce MX570

GeForce GTX 970M

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

GeForce GT 650M

Radeon RX 640 OEM

Quadro T2000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Quadro T1000 Mobile

T600 Max Q

Quadro T1000 Mobile

M1 GPU

Quadro P520

UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Adreno 685

Radeon RX 5700 XT

RTX A4500 Mobile

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 373 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.