GeForce RTX 4090 vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	661	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	6
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.83
Power efficiency	20.75	15.33
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	AD102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	16384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	2235 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	450 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	1,290
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	176
TMUs	16	512
Tensor Cores	no data	512
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	IGP	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	24 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	1.01 TB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.51

RTX 4090 100.00
+2117%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733

RTX 4090 38452
+2119%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −2480%	258 +2480%
1440p	8−9 −2363%	197 +2363%
4K	6−7 −2283%	143 +2283%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	6.20
1440p	no data	8.12
4K	no data	11.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1667%	212 +1667%
Elden Ring	10−12 −2164%	249 +2164%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −800%	110−120 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1692%	215 +1692%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −2821%	555 +2821%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1680%	178 +1680%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −1014%	150−160 +1014%
Valorant	9−10 −9078%	826 +9078%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −800%	110−120 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1558%	199 +1558%
Dota 2	14−16 −1329%	200 +1329%
Elden Ring	10−12 −4155%	468 +4155%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −548%	149 +548%
Fortnite	24−27 −1085%	300−350 +1085%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −2784%	548 +2784%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1143%	174 +1143%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1730%	183 +1730%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −451%	210−220 +451%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −1014%	150−160 +1014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1060%	170−180 +1060%
Valorant	9−10 −8522%	750−800 +8522%
World of Tanks	75−80 −272%	270−280 +272%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −800%	110−120 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1442%	185 +1442%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −830%	210−220 +830%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −2763%	544 +2763%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −451%	210−220 +451%
Valorant	9−10 −7456%	680 +7456%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −5300%	162 +5300%
Elden Ring	5−6 −6760%	343 +6760%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −5267%	161 +5267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −483%	170−180 +483%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3000%	90−95 +3000%
World of Tanks	30−35 −1513%	500−550 +1513%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −1350%	85−90 +1350%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1589%	152 +1589%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −1500%	160−170 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −8350%	507 +8350%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −7500%	152 +7500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −4267%	262 +4267%
Valorant	12−14 −4300%	572 +4300%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1069%	187 +1069%
Elden Ring	2−3 −9800%	198 +9800%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −1069%	187 +1069%
Metro Exodus	0−1	137
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1508%	200−210 +1508%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1069%	187 +1069%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2175%	90−95 +2175%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2000%	100−110 +2000%
Fortnite	3−4 −3100%	95−100 +3100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −9367%	284 +9367%
Valorant	4−5 −9000%	364 +9000%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

225

+0%

225

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

111

+0%

111

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

107

+0%

107

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	105 +0%	105 +0%
Dota 2	224 +0%	224 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

166

+0%

166

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40 +0%
Dota 2	227 +0%	227 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 is 2480% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 is 2363% faster in 1440p
RTX 4090 is 2283% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Elden Ring, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4090 is 9800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4090 is ahead in 52 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.51	100.00
Recency	30 March 2021	20 September 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	450 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 2900% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 2117.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.