Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
13.89
+1554%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by a whopping 1554% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3731137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.54no data
Architectureno dataGCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Beema/Mullins
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data686 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (FL 12_0)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 13.89
+1554%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 0.84

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 11485
+1752%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 620

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1768
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 1815
+2.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1613
+285%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 420

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 83293
+2632%
R3 (Mullins/Beema) 3049

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−36.4%
15
+36.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1583%
6−7
−1583%
Hitman 3 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+558%
12−14
−558%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+158%
30−35
−158%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1583%
6−7
−1583%
Hitman 3 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+558%
12−14
−558%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+158%
30−35
−158%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1583%
6−7
−1583%
Hitman 3 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+558%
12−14
−558%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+158%
30−35
−158%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1560%
5−6
−1560%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+3100%
3−4
−3100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+1875%
4−5
−1875%
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and R3 (Mullins/Beema) compete in popular games:

  • R3 (Mullins/Beema) is 36% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) surpassed R3 (Mullins/Beema) in all 38 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.89 0.84
Recency 30 March 2021 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 1553.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 110 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 28 votes

Rate Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.