Quadro FX 770M vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) with Quadro FX 770M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
15.71
+2656%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms FX 770M by a whopping 2656% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking3191171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataG9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1NB9P-GLM
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)14 August 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$527
Current priceno data$387 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data8.000
Floating-point performanceno data80 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Quadro FX 770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataMXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR2 / GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Hitman 3 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+100%
7−8
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Battlefield 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Hitman 3 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+425%
12−14
−425%
Metro Exodus 5 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+425%
12−14
−425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+456%
9−10
−456%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Hitman 3 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1
Hitman 3 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) surpassed FX 770M in all 36 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.71 0.57
Recency 30 March 2021 14 August 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 95 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 31 vote

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.